Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Taylor Fritz vs James McCabe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fritz vs McCabe analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Taylor Fritz vs James McCabe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fritz 0 - 0 McCabe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fritz has won 53.55% of points on their second serve, while McCabe has won 51.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fritz, in recent form, has won 48% of their opponent's second serve points, while McCabe has won 45.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.25% and 32.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fritz has saved 69.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McCabe has saved 60.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fritz has won 70.42% of matches played (W/L 50/ 21), with McCabe winning 52.54% (W/L 31/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fritz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 224/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 36/ 27). McCabe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 87/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Fritz has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72.41% of matches (W/L 21/ 8), where as McCabe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fritz has played against opponents with an average rank of 128.48 while McCabe has played against players with an average rank of 210.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fritz has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McCabe has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fritz has converted 39.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and McCabe has converted 39.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
13
Rank
5
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
342
Rank
258
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
63% (381-228)
Career Total W/L
58% (108-78)
71% (29-12)
YTD W/L
55% (23-19)
$10,379,120
Career Prize Money
$25,840
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Taylor Fritz vs James McCabe For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fritz VS McCabe
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Taylor Fritz | James McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (29/12) | 55% (23/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (70/37) | 52% (51/47) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (574/464) | 51% (484/463) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 55% (16/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 60% (6/4) |
| Aces pg | 0.82 | 0.61 |
| Aces Total | 418 | 281 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:10 | 1:52:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 142.61 | 205.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1980/3162) | 60% (1808/3015) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (1536/1980) | 71% (1278/1808) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (633/1182) | 51% (619/1207) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (113/288) | 39% (106/271) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1190/3231) | 37% (1122/3029) |
| Slam W/L | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (12/5) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (13/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (22/32) | 55% (22/40) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (12/17) | 41% (9/22) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 62% (8/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (26/25) | 90% (21/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (26/1) | 10% (21/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 19% (21/4) |
Taylor Fritz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Taylor Fritz
Player
Juncheng Shang
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
20
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
50 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
18%
(
13 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
15
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
42 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
5 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Taylor Fritz
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Milos Raonic
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
14 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
13
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Taylor Fritz
58%
(
74 of
127)
1st Serve %
56%
(
91 of
163)
11
Aces
19
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
65 of
91)
60%
(
32 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
35%
(
44 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
71 of
163)
154
Total Points Won
136
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
62%
(
104 of
168)
1st Serve %
71%
(
100 of
140)
12
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
83 of
104)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
65 of
100)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
52 of
168)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
140)
167
Total Points Won
141
|
6-3 6-2 6-7(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Dusan Lajovic
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
114
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Federico Coria
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Taylor Fritz
74%
(
70 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
118)
2
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
James McCabe
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
87 of
133)
1st Serve %
64%
(
84 of
131)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
58 of
84)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
49 of
131)
134
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(1) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
James McCabe
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
James McCabe
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve %
39%
(
12 of
31)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
43
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Martyn Pawelski
55%
(
57 of
104)
1st Serve %
50%
(
47 of
94)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
11
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
James McCabe
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
James McCabe
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
James McCabe
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Fritz Vs McCabe Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fritz are available here and McCabe photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Taylor Fritz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
